2004
Evaluation of Program Objectives Summary 5/7/2004
Evaluation
Instruments includes
·
Recent
Outstanding Graduate Awards
·
Percentage
Practicing Met Graduates
·
Alumni Survey
·
Employer Survey
·
Alumni
Advancement
·
Depart Adv Board
Report
·
Other
Departments/Centers Input
After
a long discussion, it was decided that these are to be combined as follows:
·
Alumni Survey
(Alumni Advancement, Percentage Practicing Met Grad)
·
Employer Survey
·
Department
Advisory Board Report
·
Recent Graduate
Awards
·
Other
Departments/Centers
Other departments
and centers’ input regarding our current students performance is not a direct
measure of the success of our objectives. However, it can serve as an
indication pre-graduation satisfaction of Program Objectives
There
are two categories in the evaluation of the objectives: 1) the improvement of
system to make the evaluation more effective in the future and 2) the action
items as results of the evaluation.
Actions for 2004
Evaluation Process
- We have reasonable number of return on the alumni
survey but only two employer surveys were received. More data on employer
survey is critical. Furthermore,
survey questions are to be aligned more closely with the Program
Objectives rather than with the currently alignment with Program Outcomes.
- The alumni survey questions may focus more in
relation to program objectives rather than outcomes in the future
survey. Also, survey questions are
to be aligned more closely with the Program Objectives rather than with
the currently alignment with Program Outcomes.
Objective Improvement
- Curriculum should be improved to make
communication skills better. This
action is closely related to an Outcome Assessment Action Items and is
thereby slated for improvement action.
- More emphasis should be given in ethics,
professionalism and global issues. This action is closely related to an
Outcome Assessment Action Items and is thereby slated for improvement
action, primarily in MET 310 and MET 321.