Action Review for Outcome (i)  Engage in life-long learning
2004
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
• Coordination of life-long learning (i) instruments in MET 310 and MET 321..
Curriculum Review Summary
• Life-long Learning  - Dr. Han has implemented a writing assignment designed to assess cognitive development level.  This has been correlated to life-long learning behaviors.  The assignment is designed to elicit from each student responses that target the gates needed to determine their cognitive development.  Dr. Howard will repeat this in the alternate-year MET 321 course.  Additionally, students will be required to write a personal/professional development plan and present it to their peers in MET 321.
• The average increased from 3.5 (2003) to 3.8 (2004).  No score variation was given in 2004.
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
A	Coordination MET 310 and 321,	The importance of life-long learning will be enhanced by FC modules in MET 310 and 321 (Han and Howard).
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
Coordination MET 310 with MET 321with for cognitive assessment
Assessment Process Review Summary
Dr. Han completed this during the Spring 2004 presentation of MET 310.   It will be continued in MET 321 spring 2005 by Dr. Howard.
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
N
2005
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
Cognitive-Level Assessment is now Bi-annual. Discontinue the Met 321 cognitive writing instrument from outcome (i) assessment.  The results of the cognitive-level assessment are to be completed by Dr. Stu Kellogg.  Although we appreciate this service it does make our assessment dependant on personnel outside the program. We may want to consider paying Dr. Kellogg for his service or training ourselves to complete the cognitive assessment.  We will continue under the current aegis; however, to minimize the burden on Dr Kellogg the cognitive assessment will be performed in Met 310 only.
Curriculum Review Summary
The outcome summaries increased and the range was about the same as the previous year.
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
A	Move assessment to Met 310	Move the assessment from Met 321 to Met 310.
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
Remove assessment from Met 321.
Assessment Process Review Summary
Assessment was successfully remove from Met 321 and initiated in Met 310.
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
N
2006
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
No action needed.  The assessment results derive from Dr. Stu Kellogg’s professional assessments. We are going to continue to ask him for this service but need to recognize/reward his service to us.
Curriculum Review Summary
The outcome score continue to remain very high with a low range.
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
N
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
Recognize/reward Dr. Stu Kellogg’s professional assessments service.  Our program is highly dependent on him for his assessment service for outcome (i).
Assessment Process Review Summary
No additional action.
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
N
2007
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
No action needed.
Curriculum Review Summary
The scores remain comparitively high.
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
N
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
Seek Training on Cognitive Assessment for life-long Learning – Our program is too dependent on Dr. Kellogg’s assessment service for outcome (i). We need to obtain training.
Assessment Process Review Summary
Nothing to report. In general the assessment for life-long learning is sufficient.
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
N
2008
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
No action needed.
Curriculum Review Summary
The outcome scores continue to remain high.
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
N
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
Seek Training on Cognitive Assessment for life-long Learning.
Assessment Process Review Summary
Nothing to report.
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
N
2009
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
No action needed.
Curriculum Review Summary
The assessment results for this instrument remain high.
N	No action required.
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
No actions needed.
Assessment Process Review Summary
Nothing to report.
N	No action required.
2010
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
The assessment results for this instrument remain high.
Curriculum Review Summary
Scores were down slightly, but no action is deemed to be required at the current time.
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
N	No Action
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
Nothing to report.
Assessment Process Review Summary
A variety of instruments were used and these instruments appear to be sufficien for the task.
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
N	No Action Required
2011
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
Scores were down slightly, but no action is deemed to be required at the current time.
Curriculum Review Summary
Outcome scores very high, with small variation, may want to keep an eye on this trend for persistence
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
N	No action required
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
A variety of instruments were used and these instruments appear to be sufficien for the task.
Assessment Process Review Summary
If scores remain high with little variation may want to consider more instruments
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
N	No action required
2012
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
Outcome scores very high, with small variation, may want to keep an eye on this trend for persistence
Curriculum Review Summary
Students continue to perform well but there appears to be several tenths of a point noise in the assessmsnents.
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
N	No Action
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
If scores remain high with little variation may want to consider more instruments
Assessment Process Review Summary
Students continue to perform well but there appears to be several tenths of a point noise in the assessmsnents.  No action needed unless additionall decline is encountered.
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
N	No Action
2013
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
Students continue to perform well but there appears to be several tenths of a point noise in the assessmsnents.
Curriculum Review Summary
Student performance returned to previous odd year norms (3.65 to 4.29).  No Action needed.
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
N	No Action
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
Students continue to perform well but there appears to be several tenths of a point noise in the assessmsnents.  No action needed unless additionall decline is encountered.
Assessment Process Review Summary
The system seems to have some oscillation in the average but the range results generally overlap indicating little overall difference between years.   No action needed.
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
N	No Action
2014
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
Student performance returned to previous odd year norms (3.65 to 4.29).  No Action needed.
Curriculum Review Summary
This year's performance is consistent with the general previous performance. No action needed.
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
N	No action
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
The system seems to have some oscillation in the average but the range results generally overlap indicating little overall difference between years.   No action needed.
Assessment Process Review Summary
A Watch is issued to determine if the oscillaton is related to the assessment process and, if so, why.
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
W	Oscillation	Watch to see if the oscillations continues with high performance for odd years and low for even years.
2015
Previous Curriculum Action Review Summary
This year's performance is consistent with the general previous performance. No action needed.
Curriculum Review Summary
This year the students performed at a value of 4.05.  No Action needed.
Code	Curriculum Action Title	Curriculum Action Brief Description
N	No Action
Previous Assessment Process Action Review Summary
A Watch is issued to determine if the oscillaton is related to the assessment process and, if so, why.
Assessment Process Review Summary
Overall performance is very good, but there seems to be an aspect of the system that is returning oscillating values, although the oscillation is somewhat weak.  The individual instruments are generally consistent within anyone year except that the MET 465 Senior Survey often is higher than the other instruments.  Continue the Watch.
Code	Assessment Process Action Title	Assessment Process Action Brief Description
W	Watch oscillation	Continue to Watch to see if the oscillations continues with high performance for odd years and low for even years.